Swiss Bankers Charged with Helping 180 US clients hide assets abroad

Two Julius Baer Group Ltd. (BAER) client advisers were charged with helping U.S. customers of the Zurich- based bank evade taxes, according to an indictment and a person with knowledge of the matter.

Daniela Casadei and Fabio Frazzetto conspired with more than 180 U.S. clients and others at the bank to hide at least $600 million in assets from the Internal Revenue Service, according to the indictment in federal court in New York and the person, who wasn’t authorized to speak about the matter. The indictment refers to the bank as Swiss Bank No. 1. Read more in Bloomberg

If You Failed to Enter the IRS Offshore Disclosure Program (At Risk Taxpayers)

You should immediately seek competent legal and tax advice on how best to proceed  with filing your past tax returns and IRS foreign asset reporting forms now that the September 9, 2011 deadline has passed, if you failed to enter the Program.

Most delinquent t taxpayers  that have not disclose their foreign assets, filed the special IRS Offshore Forms, or have not filed their tax returns for past years probably do not face criminal action, but may incur horrendous penalties which grow worse the longer they wait to come forward.  You alternatives are now fewer than they used to be but there are still steps you can take.

There are no clear preferable courses of action but if you talk with a professional and learn your alternatives, it will help you make a decision on planning your future course of action.  Best to talk with an  experienced  tax attorney in any event to give yourself the privacy and confidentiality of attorney-client privilege. Contact us to make an appointment for a phone or skype consultation to discuss your individual situation and create a strategy to proceed.  Offshore Disclosure Email.

To read more about the IRS General Disclosure Program click here.

The 75% Fraud Penalty (Plus Possible Prison Time)

If you get audited, and the IRS decides your tax return fraudulently understates your tax bill, you are in really big trouble. You will be hit with a penalty equal to 75% of the understatement. Plus you will be charged interest. And you could face criminal charges and possible prison time. In the next few years audits of expatriates and form 2555 (foreign earned income exclusion) will increase substantially due to recent discoveries about how many such forms were incorrect and were being filed by expats not eligible for the exclusion.

Committing tax fraud takes some work, because it goes beyond simple ignorance of the tax rules and regulations. You have to intentionally do really bad things like keep two sets of books, alter or destroy documents, hide unreported income overseas, or fail to report income from illegal activities (this is not a complete list by any stretch). Bottom line: You can't commit tax fraud without knowing it.

Anyone accused of tax fraud should hire an attorney who specializes in big-time IRS problems. A CPA or Enrolled Agent can't provide the equivalent of the attorney-client privilege, and those accused of tax fraud will need that privilege. Also, non-attorneys are not competent to deal with the criminal charges that will often go along for the ride with tax fraud cases.

IRS Releases Draft of Instructions to Form 8938- 2011 Required Tax Form to Report Foreign Financial Assets

The IRS has released draft instructions to Form 8938. Form 8938 must be filed with your 2011 income tax return to report  Foreign Financial Assets if the total value of those assets exceed a reporting thresholds. Read the draft instructions here.    What ever happened to the IRS Paperwork Reduction Act which to our knowledge was never repealed. See the current IRS draft of Form 8938.  

It is interesting to note you do not have to report your ownership of foreign real estate unless it is held in a foreign trust, corporation, etc.   At this point in time, it also appears you do not have to report any gold or other assets buried in your back yard (abroad) or held in your personal safe in your offshore villa.

These drafts are still subject to revision before the end of 2011.

US Expats Living Abroad can Get An Additional 2 month Extension of Time to File 2010 returns until December 15th.

US Expats living abroad on 4/15, get an automatic extension to file  their returns until 6/15. On June 15th  if you file Form 4868 an expat can get an additional extension until October 17th.


Now expats can secure an additional extension of time to file their return until December 15th,  if they send in a letter by October 15th requesting an additional two months of time to file their 2010 income tax return. We strongly recommend the letter be sent by certified mail return receipt since you will not hear back from the IRS unless your request is denied.  You must state the reason(s) you need the additional time in the letter.  The letter should be mailed to: Department of the Treasury , Internal Revenue Service Center, Austin, TX 73301-0215. You can read more about this additional extension request on page 4 of   IRS publication 54.

China Will Now Collect ChineseSocial Security from Foreign Workers

From October 15, expats working in mainland China will be forced to pay 11 per cent of their salaries to the government in exchange for access to benefits such as pension coverage and medical insurance.

While employees will see a significant chunk of their tax-home pay disappear, their employers are also being hit by the new tax, as companies are forced to contribute a further 37 per cent of the foreign staff’s salaries.

The move could discourage multinationals from sending foreign workers to China in the future, while employees will be concerned about another raid on their salaries. Income tax in some cities in China is already charged at 45 per cent at the top tier.

Given China’s hunger for foreign talent, especially in cities such as Shanghai, it has been quick to promote the benefits for foreign workers.

Possible FBAR Penalties That May be imposed When Opting Out of Voluntary Disclosure Program

The CPA Insider has an excellent article by Janice Eiseman on the possible FBAR penalties that might be imposed a taxpayer that chose not to participate in the 2011 Voluntary Disclosure Program or opts out and just files the forms outside of that program. It appears based on case law and IRS procedures often the penalty for non willfully failing to file can be less that the $10,000 the IRS suggests it might be. Click here to read the article.

IRS Voluntary Disclosure after 9/9/11

Standard Taxpayer IRS Voluntary Disclosure is still available after 9/9/11.

If you missed the 9/9/11 Deadline to enter the 2011 iRS Voluntary Disclosure Program you still can take advantage of the IRS Voluntary Disclosure Program which has always been in effect.  This procedure should be followed if  you have unfilled past tax returns and also have FBAR, Foreign Corporation, Foreign Partnership, Foreign Trust, and other special IRS forms which have not been filed in a timely manner.  The procedure described below is only available if you come forward first before the IRS discovers you have not been filing. Read the details of the program below.

Voluntary Disclosure Practice (1)  It is currently the practice of the IRS that a voluntary disclosure will be considered along with all other factors in the investigation in determining whether criminal prosecution will be recommended.  This voluntary disclosure practice creates no substantive or procedural rights for taxpayers, but rather is a matter of internal IRS practice, provided solely for guidance to IRS personnel.  Taxpayers cannot rely on the fact that other similarly situated taxpayers may not have been recommended for criminal prosecution. (2)  A voluntary disclosure will not automatically guarantee immunity from  prosecution; however, a voluntary disclosure may result in prosecution not being recommended.  This practice does not apply to taxpayers with illegal source income. (3)  A voluntary disclosure occurs when the communication is truthful, timely, complete, and when:  a.  the taxpayer shows a willingness to cooperate (and  does in fact cooperate) with the IRS in determining his or her correct tax liability; and b.   the taxpayer makes good faith arrangements with the IRS to pay in full, the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable. (4) A disclosure is timely if it is received before: a.  the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation of the taxpayer, or has notified the taxpayer that it intends to commence such an examination or investigation; b.  the IRS has received information from a third party (e.g., informant, other governmental agency, or the media) alerting the IRS to the specific taxpayer’s noncompliance; c.  the IRS has initiated a civil examination or criminal investigation which is directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer; or d.  the IRS has acquired information directly related to the specific liability of the taxpayer from a criminal enforcement action (e.g., search warrant, grand jury subpoena). (5)  Any taxpayer who contacts the IRS in person or through a representative regarding voluntary disclosure will be directed to Criminal Investigation for evaluation of the disclosure.  Special agents are encouraged to consult Area Counsel, Criminal Tax on voluntary disclosure issues. (6)  Examples of voluntary disclosures include: a.  a letter from an attorney which encloses amended returns from a client which are complete and accurate (reporting legal source income omitted from the original returns), which offers to pay the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable in full and which meets the timeliness standard set forth above.  This is a voluntary disclosure because all elements of (3), above are met. b.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer of omitted income facilitated through a barter exchange after the IRS has announced that it has begun a civil compliance project targeting barter exchanges; however the IRS has not yet commenced an examination or investigation of the taxpayer or notified the taxpayer of its intention to do so.  In addition, the taxpayer files complete and accurate amended returns and makes arrangements with the IRS to pay in full, the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable.  This is a voluntary disclosure because the civil compliance project involving barter exchanges does not yet directly relate to the specific liability of the taxpayer and  because all other elements of (3), above are met c.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer of omitted income facilitated through a widely promoted scheme regarding which the IRS has begun a civil compliance project and already obtained information which might lead to an examination of the taxpayer; however, the IRS has not yet commenced an examination or investigation of the taxpayer or notified the taxpayer of its intent to do so.  In addition, the  taxpayer files complete and accurate returns and makes arrangements with the IRS to pay in full, the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable.  This is a voluntary disclosure because the civil compliance project involving the scheme does not yet directly relate to the specific liability of the taxpayer and because all other elements of (3), above are met. d.  A disclosure made by an individual who has not filed tax returns after the individual has received a notice stating that the IRS has no record of receiving a return for a particular year and inquiring into whether the taxpayer filed a return for that year.  The individual files complete and accurate returns and makes arrangements with the IRS to pay the tax, interest, and any penalties determined by the IRS to be applicable in full.  This is a voluntary disclosure because the IRS has not yet commenced an examination or investigation of the taxpayer or notified the taxpayer of its intent to do so and because all other elements of (3), above, are met. (7) Examples of what are not voluntary disclosures include: a.  a letter from an attorney stating his or her client, who wishes to remain anonymous, wants to resolve his or her tax liability. This is not a voluntary disclosure until the identity of the taxpayer is disclosed and all other elements of (3) above have been met. b.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer who is under grand jury investigation.  This is not a voluntary disclosure because the taxpayer is already under criminal investigation.  The conclusion would be the same whether or not the taxpayer knew of the grand jury investigation. c.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer, who is not currently under examination or investigation, of omitted gross receipts from a partnership, but whose partner is already under investigation for omitted income skimmed from the partnership.  This is not a voluntary disclosure because the IRS has already initiated an investigation which is directly related to the specific liability of this taxpayer.  The conclusion would be the same whether or not the taxpayer knew of the ongoing investigation. d.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer, who is not currently under examination or investigation, of omitted constructive dividends received from a corporation which is currently  under examination.  This is not a voluntary disclosure because the IRS has already initiated an examination which is directly related to the specific liability of this taxpayer.  The conclusion would be the same whether or not the taxpayer knew of the ongoing examination. e.  a disclosure made by a taxpayer after an employee has contacted the IRS regarding the taxpayer's double set of books.  This is not a voluntary disclosure even if no examination or investigation has yet commenced because the IRS has already been informed by the third party of the specific taxpayer's noncompliance.  The conclusion would be the same whether or not the taxpayer knew of the informant's contact with the IRS. We can help you make a Voluntary Disclosure and provide you with the complete confidentiality and privacy of  "Attorney-client" privilege.  Do not wait until it is too late.

CURRENT IRS PROGRESS COMBATING INTERNATIONAL TAX EVASION

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service continues to make strong progress in combating international tax evasion, with new details announced today showing the recently completed offshore program pushed the total number of voluntary disclosures up to 30,000 since 2009. In all, 12,000 new applications came in from the 2011 offshore program that closed last week.

The IRS also announced today it has collected $2.2 billion so far from people who participated in the 2009 program, reflecting closures of about 80 percent of the cases from the initial offshore program. On top of that, the IRS has collected an additional $500 million in taxes and interest as down payments for the 2011 program — a figure that will increase because it doesn’t yet include penalties.
“By any measure, we are in the middle of an unprecedented period for our global international tax enforcement efforts,” said IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman. “We have pierced international bank secrecy laws, and we are making a serious dent in offshore tax evasion.”
Global tax enforcement is a top priority at the IRS, and Shulman noted progress on multiple fronts, including ground-breaking international tax agreements and increased cooperation with other governments. In addition, the IRS and Justice Department have increased efforts involving criminal investigation of international tax evasion.
The combination of efforts helped support the 2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative (OVDI), which ended on Sept. 9. The 2011 effort followed the strong response to the 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP) that ended on Oct. 15, 2009. The programs gave U.S.taxpayers with undisclosed assets or income offshore a second chance to get compliant with the U.S. tax system, pay their fair share and avoid potential criminal charges.
The 2009 program led to about 15,000 voluntary disclosures and another 3,000 applicants who came in after the deadline, but were allowed to participate in the 2011 initiative. Beyond that, the 2011 program has generated an additional 12,000 voluntary disclosures, with some additional applications still being counted. All together from these efforts, taxpayers came forward and made 30,000 voluntary disclosures.
“My goal all along was to get people back into the U.S. tax system,” Shulman said. “Not only are we bringing people back into the U.S. tax system, we are bringing revenue into the U.S. Treasury and turning the tide against offshore tax evasion.”
In new figures announced today from the 2009 offshore program, the IRS has $2.2 billion in hand from taxes, interest and penalties representing about 80 percent of the 2009 cases that have closed. These cases come from every corner of the world, with bank accounts covering 140 countries.
The IRS is starting to work through the 2011 applications. The $500 million in payments so far from the 2011 program brings the total collected through the offshore programs to $2.7 billion.
“This dollar figure will grow in the months ahead,” Shulman said. “But just as importantly, we have changed the risk calculus. Americans now understand that if they try to hide assets overseas, the chances of being caught continue to increase.”
The financial impact can be seen in a variety of other areas beyond the 2009 and 2011 programs.

• Criminal prosecutions. People hiding assets offshore have received jail sentences running for months or years, and they have been ordered to pay hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars.
• UBS. UBS AG, Switzerland's largest bank, agreed in 2009 to pay $780 million in fines, penalties, interest and restitution as part of a deferred prosecution agreement with the U.S. government.

The two disclosure programs provided the IRS with a wealth of information on various banks and advisors assisting people with offshore tax evasion, and the IRS will use this information to continue its international enforcement efforts.

Expatriates Living Abroad Can Request An Additional Extension of time to December 15th.

If you are an expat living abroad  on  4/15,  you receive an automatic extension of time until June  15th to file your income tax return return with the IRS.

If you cannot file your return within the automatic 2-month extension period, you generally can get an additional 4 months (using form 4868) to file your return, for a total of 6 months. The 2-month period and the 6-month period start at the same time. You have to request the additional 4 months by the new due date allowed by the 2-month extension.

  The additional 4 months of time to file (unlike the original 2-month extension) is not an extension of time to pay. You must make an accurate estimate of your tax based on the information available to you. If you find you cannot pay the full amount due with Form 4868, you can still get the extension. You will owe interest on the unpaid amount from the original due date of the return.

  You also may be charged a penalty for paying the tax late unless you have reasonable cause for not paying your tax when due. Penalties for paying the tax late are assessed from the original due date of your return, unless you qualify for the automatic 2-month extension. In that situation, penalties for paying late are assessed from the extended due date of the payment (June 15 for calendar year taxpayers).

Additional extension of time for taxpayers out of the country.   In addition to the 6-month extension, taxpayers who are out of the country can request a discretionary 2-month additional extension of time to file their returns (to December 15 for calendar year taxpayers).

  To request this extension, you must send the Internal Revenue Service a letter explaining the reasons why you need the additional 2 months. Send the letter by the extended due date (October 15 for calendar year taxpayers) to the following address:

Department of the Treasury
Internal Revenue Service Center
Austin, TX 73301-0215

You will not receive any notification from the Internal Revenue Service unless your request is denied.

How U.S Tax Policy Is Forcing 5 Million Americans Abroad To Reconsider Citizenship

Read the article in the Business Insider about the onerous US tax policy on US expatriates and green card holders that is forcing millions to consider giving up their US Citizenship or Residency status by CLICKING HERE. We can help you surrender your US Citizenship or Permanent Resident status including preparing all applicable required special  tax forms. Read about the procedures and requirements HERE. Contact us if you wish assistance via email  at US Expatriation.  To date we have advised or assisted over 30 previous green card holders or citizens surrender their US status and in most situations never have to file any US tax returns again.

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion - Seaman & Ships Employees

Benefits under section 911 (Foreign Earned Income Exclusion of $92,900 for 2011) are conditioned upon the taxpayer being present or residing in a foreign country. A ship employee’s presence or residence aboard a ship does not qualify as presence or residence in a foreign country for purposes of section 911 even though the ship is of a foreign registry or is in international waters. The regulations have consistently defined the term "foreign country" as " any territory under the sovereignty of a government other than that of the United States." See Treas. Reg. section 1.911-2(h). It includes the territorial waters of the foreign country as determined in accordance with the laws of the United States. In Revenue Ruling 67-52, 1967-1 C.B. 186, cited in L.R. Martin, 50 T.C. 59 (1968), the Service ruled that the Antarctica region is not under the sovereignty of any government and, therefore, is not considered a foreign country for purposes of section 911. Also, in Revenue Ruling 73-181, 1973-1 C.B. 347, the Service ruled that physical presence on a fishing boat in international waters, adjacent to the territorial waters of a foreign country, does not satisfy the presence requirement of Section 911(d)(2). In Souza, 33 T.C. 817 (1960), the court held that a U.S. registered fishing vessel operating off the coast of Peru beyond the 3 mile territorial waters limit but within the 200 mile limit recognized by Peru as its territorial waters does not constitute presence in a foreign country for purposes of section 911. The court ruled, the fact that a vessel is of U.S. or foreign registry should have no effect on the determination of whether its crews members are present or resident in a foreign country. Consequently, the high seas and Antarctica are not considered a foreign country for purposes of section 911. See also, Balestries, 47 BTA 241.

Amercian Citizens Abroad Call for Repeal of Foreign Bank Account Reporting on US Taxpayer Offshore Accounts

American Citizens Abroad (ACA) is advocating for the repeal of the draconian IRS rules requiring foreign banks withhold and report on foreign bank and financial accounts held by US taxpayers located  outside of the USA. Read the Forbes Magazine Article by clicking on this link.

2011 Foreign Earned Income Exclusion Increases

For 2011, the foreign earned income exclusion for wages earned while working  and living abroad will be $92,900.  That is a $1,400 increase from that allowed for 2010.  If both spouses work abroad, each can exclude their earned income from US taxes up to that amount.  One spouse cannot use the other spouses unused portion of that exclusion.

If your are married and live abroad with your spouse, consider making her an employee or starting her own business since she will also receive a foreign earned income exclusion for 2011 of of $92,900 to be applied against her taxable income on her US income tax return.

You can also claim a deduction for foreign rental expenses, utilities and maintenance above a certain amount up to a maximum amount which varies per the country you in which you are living and working.

Quiet or Silent Disclosure May Not be Best Way to Go With Respect to Foreign Financial Accounts, Foreign corps, trusts, and partnerships

Forbes Magazine Article Does not recommend that taxpayers try "silent or quiet" disclosure to reveal their offshore bank accounts, financial accounts, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships or foreign trusts. The IRS says they are looking for individuals who are attempting to file past special foreign asset reporting forms and will hit them with the maximum penalties and possible criminal prosecution. Click Here to Read Article.

The IRS has extended the deadline for entering the 2011 Voluntary Offshore Disclosure Program to 9/9/11 from the original deadline of 8/31/11.   This will avoid the possible huge penalties which can be incurred if a taxpayer attempts to silently or quietly disclose.

IRS Extends 2011 Voluntary Offshore Disclosure Filing Deadline to September 9, 2011

Note: Though you may have missed the program which ended 9/9/11, you still can file all past unfiled tax returns including forms 5471, 8865, 3520, FBAR, etc., under the regular  IRS disclosure program which has always existed. Coming forward and entering this program in most situations will avoid any possible criminal prosecution and you can negotiate with the IRS to attempt to reduce the penalties they might try to impose for filing late offshore reporting tax forms.  See our website at www.taxmeless.com  to learn more about this procedure.


  If you have entered the 2011 Program, and are representing yourself, our firm can provide you with guidance and advice if you wish to continue  your self representation, or we can step in and act as your representative before the IRS.  We can also help you if you are not satisfied with your current representative. If you tax representative is an Attorney, they can provide you with the privacy and confidentiality of Attorney-Client privilege which is not available from a CPA or EA.




IRS Statement: OVDI Deadline Extension(Aug. 26, 2011)

Due to the potential impact of Hurricane Irene, the IRS has extended the due date for offshore voluntary disclosure initiative requests untilSeptember 9, 2011.  For those taxpayers who have not yet submitted their request and any documents, the following actions are necessary by September 9, 2011:

• Identifying information must be submitted to the Criminal Investigation office.  This includes name, address, date of birth, and social security number and as much of the other information requested in the Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter as possible.  This information must be sent to:

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Coordinator
600 Arch Street, Room 6404
Philadelphia, PA 19106.

• Send a request for a 90-day extension for submitting the complete  voluntary disclosure package of information to the Austin campus.  This request must be sent to:

Internal Revenue Service
3651 S. I H 35 Stop 4301 AUSC
Austin, TX 78741
ATTN:  2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative

WHEN ARE FOREIGN PENSION PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS TAXABLE ON US TAX RETURNS?

US expatriates working for foreign employers may participate in foreign pension plans. These plans normally have beneficial tax treatment under local law. Unfortunately, these foreign arrangements generally do not meet the US "qualification rules". As a result, the beneficial treatment under local law is often not available to US citizens working abroad..

US QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

US employer sponsored pension plans qualify for special tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code: tax deductible contributions for the employer; earnings in the plan are tax exempt; and the employee is not taxed until the benefits are received upon retirement or withdrawal of those pension funds. These tax benefits are not available unless the plan meets the specific requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The determination of when amounts deferred under a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement are includible in the gross income of the taxpayer depends on the facts and circumstances of the arrangement and which Code section applies to those facts.

IRC § 402(b) Plans

Employer sponsored non-qualified funded deferred compensation plans are generally governed by the provisions of IRC § 402(b). US employees who participate in such a plan are taxed on the amount of the contributions made by the employer (once the benefits are vested or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture). If the employee is a "highly compensated" (compensation exceeds $105,000 or part of the top 20% of employees) the employee is taxed on both the contribution and the growth in the plan each year (to the extent the benefits are vested. (Non-Highly compensated employees are not taxed on the growth in the plan, but are taxed when the benefits are distributed.)

IRC § 409A

The provisions of IRC § 409A apply to deferred compensation plans not covered by IRC § 402(b), plans covered by a tax treaty or foreign pension plans that are available on a broad base to the employer's employees (but only to the extent of non-elective deferrals and employer contributions as limited by US rules).

Under IRC § 409A, if the deferred compensation arrangement does not meet the requirements of IRC § 409A, the employee will be subject to normal income tax, a 20% penalty tax and an interest charge. To meet the rules of IRC § 409A, the plan must provide that distributions from the deferred compensation plan are only allowed on separation from service, death, a specified time (or under a fixed schedule), change in control of a corporation, occurrence of an unforeseeable emergency, or if the participant becomes disabled.

The plan may not allow for the acceleration of benefits, except as provided by regulations. The plan must provide that compensation for services performed during a tax year may be deferred at the participant's election only if the election to defer is made no later than the close of the preceding tax year, or at such other time as provided in regulations.

The actual time and manner of distributions must be specified at the time of initial deferral.

INCOME TAX TREATY-PENSIONS

The normal US income tax rules may be altered by applicable treaty provisions; for example, the United States and the United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty. While the treaty does not specifically provide that each country's qualified plans will be treated as qualified plans by the other country, the treaty effectively provides for such a result with tax deferrals and tax reductions, but subject to certain limits.

In the context of a US citizen employed in the UK and participating in a pension plan established by the UK employer, the rules are that the employee may deduct (or exclude) contributions made by or on behalf of the individual to the plan; and benefits accrued under the plan are not taxable income. The Treaty further provides that the deduction (or exclusion) rule only applies to the extent the contributions or benefits qualify for tax relief in the UK and that such relief may not exceed the reliefs that would be allowed in the US under its domestic rules.

With respect to distributions the general rule under the Treaty is that a pension received by a resident of one country is only taxable by the country of residence. For Lump Sum payments, the general rule is that only the country of the situs of the pension plan may tax the distribution. However, as in most US treaties, the US retains the right to tax its citizens as if the treaty were not in force; with the result that the US retains its right to tax its citizens on both periodic distributions as well as lump sum distributions. Double taxation is avoided through the use of the foreign tax credit rules.

HOW TO TREAT CONTRIBUTIONS  TO YOUR FOREIGN PENSION PLAN

Where a US citizen employee participates in a foreign pension plan, it is likely that the plan will not have met the US qualification rules. Thus, the employee will be subject to US tax on the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan. For employees that live in a jurisdiction that imposes an income tax at rates higher than the US rate, it is likely that the employee will have generated a pool of "excess foreign tax credits". These credits may be used to offset the US tax on foreign sourced income and therefore may be used to reduce (or eliminate) the US tax that may currently arise on the deferred compensation.

If the employee has "excess foreign tax credits", (and provided the deferred compensation is "foreign sourced income"), the current US tax on such income may be partially or fully offset.  Another possibility is for the US taxpayer to make a claim under an applicable treaty (if the country of employment has a Tax Treaty with the US).. If there is a treaty with proper pension provisions, and  the contributions to the plan have not exceeded the US plan limitations, the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan should not be subject to current US income tax.  If there is no treaty with the country the expat is living in, then there is no deferral of pension contributions by a foreign employer.

An expat taxpayer has the choice of using excess foreign tax credits or invoking an applicable tax treaty to avoid having to pay current US income tax on contributions and the growth in the foreign deferred compensation scheme. Whether to use excess credits or to invoke the treaty will depend on a number of factors such as which may vary each particular situation.

TAX REPORTING:

There are a number of reporting requirements that may apply in addition to the individual's income tax return. This may include certain foreign trust  reporting returns (form 3520 and 3520A), as well as the Treasury report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts which is form TD F 90-22.1. This report must be filed when your foreign accounts(when combined together at their highest balances during the year) exceed $10,000 and covers not only bank accounts but arrangements outside the US that are virtually any type of financial account. This form must be filed by June 30 of each year, and there are no extensions. Substantial penalties (including criminal penalties) may apply.

US expatriates working for foreign employers may participate in foreign pension plans. These plans normally have beneficial tax treatment under local law. Unfortunately, these foreign arrangements generally do not meet the US "qualification rules". As a result, the beneficial treatment under local law is often not available to US citizens working abroad..

US QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

US employer sponsored pension plans qualify for special tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code: tax deductible contributions for the employer; earnings in the plan are tax exempt; and the employee is not taxed until the benefits are received upon retirement or withdrawal of those pension funds. These tax benefits are not available unless the plan meets the specific requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The determination of when amounts deferred under a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement are includible in the gross income of the taxpayer depends on the facts and circumstances of the arrangement and which Code section applies to those facts.

IRC § 402(b) Plans

Employer sponsored non-qualified funded deferred compensation plans are generally governed by the provisions of IRC § 402(b). US employees who participate in such a plan are taxed on the amount of the contributions made by the employer (once the benefits are vested or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture). If the employee is a "highly compensated" (compensation exceeds $105,000 or part of the top 20% of employees) the employee is taxed on both the contribution and the growth in the plan each year (to the extent the benefits are vested. (Non-Highly compensated employees are not taxed on the growth in the plan, but are taxed when the benefits are distributed.)

IRC § 409A

The provisions of IRC § 409A apply to deferred compensation plans not covered by IRC § 402(b), plans covered by a tax treaty or foreign pension plans that are available on a broad base to the employer's employees (but only to the extent of non-elective deferrals and employer contributions as limited by US rules).

Under IRC § 409A, if the deferred compensation arrangement does not meet the requirements of IRC § 409A, the employee will be subject to normal income tax, a 20% penalty tax and an interest charge. To meet the rules of IRC § 409A, the plan must provide that distributions from the deferred compensation plan are only allowed on separation from service, death, a specified time (or under a fixed schedule), change in control of a corporation, occurrence of an unforeseeable emergency, or if the participant becomes disabled.

The plan may not allow for the acceleration of benefits, except as provided by regulations. The plan must provide that compensation for services performed during a tax year may be deferred at the participant's election only if the election to defer is made no later than the close of the preceding tax year, or at such other time as provided in regulations.

The actual time and manner of distributions must be specified at the time of initial deferral.

INCOME TAX TREATY-PENSIONS

The normal US income tax rules may be altered by applicable treaty provisions; for example, the United States and the United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty. While the treaty does not specifically provide that each country's qualified plans will be treated as qualified plans by the other country, the treaty effectively provides for such a result with tax deferrals and tax reductions, but subject to certain limits.

In the context of a US citizen employed in the UK and participating in a pension plan established by the UK employer, the rules are that the employee may deduct (or exclude) contributions made by or on behalf of the individual to the plan; and benefits accrued under the plan are not taxable income. The Treaty further provides that the deduction (or exclusion) rule only applies to the extent the contributions or benefits qualify for tax relief in the UK and that such relief may not exceed the reliefs that would be allowed in the US under its domestic rules.

With respect to distributions the general rule under the Treaty is that a pension received by a resident of one country is only taxable by the country of residence. For Lump Sum payments, the general rule is that only the country of the situs of the pension plan may tax the distribution. However, as in most US treaties, the US retains the right to tax its citizens as if the treaty were not in force; with the result that the US retains its right to tax its citizens on both periodic distributions as well as lump sum distributions. Double taxation is avoided through the use of the foreign tax credit rules.

HOW TO TREAT CONTRIBUTIONS  TO YOUR FOREIGN PENSION PLAN

Where a US citizen employee participates in a foreign pension plan, it is likely that the plan will not have met the US qualification rules. Thus, the employee will be subject to US tax on the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan. For employees that live in a jurisdiction that imposes an income tax at rates higher than the US rate, it is likely that the employee will have generated a pool of "excess foreign tax credits". These credits may be used to offset the US tax on foreign sourced income and therefore may be used to reduce (or eliminate) the US tax that may currently arise on the deferred compensation.

If the employee has "excess foreign tax credits", (and provided the deferred compensation is "foreign sourced income"), the current US tax on such income may be partially or fully offset.  Another possibility is for the US taxpayer to make a claim under an applicable treaty (if the country of employment has a Tax Treaty with the US).. If there is a treaty with proper pension provisions, and  the contributions to the plan have not exceeded the US plan limitations, the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan should not be subject to current US income tax.  If there is no treaty with the country the expat is living in, then there is no deferral of pension contributions by a foreign employer.

An expat taxpayer has the choice of using excess foreign tax credits or invoking an applicable tax treaty to avoid having to pay current US income tax on contributions and the growth in the foreign deferred compensation scheme. Whether to use excess credits or to invoke the treaty will depend on a number of factors such as which may vary each particular situation.

TAX REPORTING:

There are a number of reporting requirements that may apply in addition to the individual's income tax return. This may include certain foreign trust  reporting returns (form 3520 and 3520A), as well as the Treasury report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts which is form TD F 90-22.1. This report must be filed when your foreign accounts(when combined together at their highest balances during the year) exceed $10,000 and covers not only bank accounts but arrangements outside the US that are virtually any type of financial account. This form must be filed by June 30 of each year, and there are no extensions. Substantial penalties (including criminal penalties) may apply.

Will Canada Revenue Agency Help the IRS Collect the Penalties for Various Unfiled Foreign Reporting Forms?

Click here to visit the link to recent article in the Vancouver Sun about Canada Revenue Agency Opinion. on enforcing IRS penalties for not filing FBARS, Foreign corporation and partnership forms, etc. It appears they will not help the IRS collect such penalties if assessed.

Ninth Circuit finds Fifth Amendment (self incrimination) inapplicable to offshore banking records

M.H. v. United States; No. 11-55712 (8/19/2011)

The Ninth Circuit recently held that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination may not be used by a taxpayer under grand jury investigation for the use of his undisclosed Swiss bank accounts.

Facts. An unamed taxpayer was the target of a grand jury investigation to determine whether he used undisclosed Swiss bank accounts to evade paying federal taxes. Records indicating that the taxpayer had transferred assets from an account at UBS AG to an account with UEB Geneva in 2002 was disclosed to the U.S. under a 2009 deferred prosecution agreement between the U.S. Department of Justice and UBS.

District Court. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California granted a motion to compel the taxpayer to provide his records pertaining to his foreign bank accounts under the Required Records Doctrine. Under the doctrine, records that are required to be maintained by law fall outside the scope of the Fifth Amendment privilege, when certain conditions are satisfied.

The taxpayer argued that the information requested could conflict with other information he may have provided to the IRS. Thus, production of the requested records would be self incriminating. Moreover, the taxpayer argued that the denial of maintaining such evidence would also be self incriminating because the failure to maintain such documentation is a felony.

Circuit Court. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that under Grosso v. U.S., 390 U.S. 62 (1968) documents that are regulatory, customarily kept and have some public aspects apply to documents that must maintained under the Bank Secrecy Act.

The decision can be viewed at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/08/19/11-55712.pdf.

Delinquent U.S. Foreign Information Returns: Is Filing Under the 2011 OVDI Appropriate?

Read more about whether or not you should enter the OVD program in the following article form the AICPA Tax Advisor  publication.  Click here to read the article: .