How U.S Tax Policy Is Forcing 5 Million Americans Abroad To Reconsider Citizenship

Read the article in the Business Insider about the onerous US tax policy on US expatriates and green card holders that is forcing millions to consider giving up their US Citizenship or Residency status by CLICKING HERE. We can help you surrender your US Citizenship or Permanent Resident status including preparing all applicable required special  tax forms. Read about the procedures and requirements HERE. Contact us if you wish assistance via email  at US Expatriation.  To date we have advised or assisted over 30 previous green card holders or citizens surrender their US status and in most situations never have to file any US tax returns again.

Foreign Earned Income Exclusion - Seaman & Ships Employees

Benefits under section 911 (Foreign Earned Income Exclusion of $92,900 for 2011) are conditioned upon the taxpayer being present or residing in a foreign country. A ship employee’s presence or residence aboard a ship does not qualify as presence or residence in a foreign country for purposes of section 911 even though the ship is of a foreign registry or is in international waters. The regulations have consistently defined the term "foreign country" as " any territory under the sovereignty of a government other than that of the United States." See Treas. Reg. section 1.911-2(h). It includes the territorial waters of the foreign country as determined in accordance with the laws of the United States. In Revenue Ruling 67-52, 1967-1 C.B. 186, cited in L.R. Martin, 50 T.C. 59 (1968), the Service ruled that the Antarctica region is not under the sovereignty of any government and, therefore, is not considered a foreign country for purposes of section 911. Also, in Revenue Ruling 73-181, 1973-1 C.B. 347, the Service ruled that physical presence on a fishing boat in international waters, adjacent to the territorial waters of a foreign country, does not satisfy the presence requirement of Section 911(d)(2). In Souza, 33 T.C. 817 (1960), the court held that a U.S. registered fishing vessel operating off the coast of Peru beyond the 3 mile territorial waters limit but within the 200 mile limit recognized by Peru as its territorial waters does not constitute presence in a foreign country for purposes of section 911. The court ruled, the fact that a vessel is of U.S. or foreign registry should have no effect on the determination of whether its crews members are present or resident in a foreign country. Consequently, the high seas and Antarctica are not considered a foreign country for purposes of section 911. See also, Balestries, 47 BTA 241.

Amercian Citizens Abroad Call for Repeal of Foreign Bank Account Reporting on US Taxpayer Offshore Accounts

American Citizens Abroad (ACA) is advocating for the repeal of the draconian IRS rules requiring foreign banks withhold and report on foreign bank and financial accounts held by US taxpayers located  outside of the USA. Read the Forbes Magazine Article by clicking on this link.

2011 Foreign Earned Income Exclusion Increases

For 2011, the foreign earned income exclusion for wages earned while working  and living abroad will be $92,900.  That is a $1,400 increase from that allowed for 2010.  If both spouses work abroad, each can exclude their earned income from US taxes up to that amount.  One spouse cannot use the other spouses unused portion of that exclusion.

If your are married and live abroad with your spouse, consider making her an employee or starting her own business since she will also receive a foreign earned income exclusion for 2011 of of $92,900 to be applied against her taxable income on her US income tax return.

You can also claim a deduction for foreign rental expenses, utilities and maintenance above a certain amount up to a maximum amount which varies per the country you in which you are living and working.

Quiet or Silent Disclosure May Not be Best Way to Go With Respect to Foreign Financial Accounts, Foreign corps, trusts, and partnerships

Forbes Magazine Article Does not recommend that taxpayers try "silent or quiet" disclosure to reveal their offshore bank accounts, financial accounts, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships or foreign trusts. The IRS says they are looking for individuals who are attempting to file past special foreign asset reporting forms and will hit them with the maximum penalties and possible criminal prosecution. Click Here to Read Article.

The IRS has extended the deadline for entering the 2011 Voluntary Offshore Disclosure Program to 9/9/11 from the original deadline of 8/31/11.   This will avoid the possible huge penalties which can be incurred if a taxpayer attempts to silently or quietly disclose.

IRS Extends 2011 Voluntary Offshore Disclosure Filing Deadline to September 9, 2011

Note: Though you may have missed the program which ended 9/9/11, you still can file all past unfiled tax returns including forms 5471, 8865, 3520, FBAR, etc., under the regular  IRS disclosure program which has always existed. Coming forward and entering this program in most situations will avoid any possible criminal prosecution and you can negotiate with the IRS to attempt to reduce the penalties they might try to impose for filing late offshore reporting tax forms.  See our website at www.taxmeless.com  to learn more about this procedure.


  If you have entered the 2011 Program, and are representing yourself, our firm can provide you with guidance and advice if you wish to continue  your self representation, or we can step in and act as your representative before the IRS.  We can also help you if you are not satisfied with your current representative. If you tax representative is an Attorney, they can provide you with the privacy and confidentiality of Attorney-Client privilege which is not available from a CPA or EA.




IRS Statement: OVDI Deadline Extension(Aug. 26, 2011)

Due to the potential impact of Hurricane Irene, the IRS has extended the due date for offshore voluntary disclosure initiative requests untilSeptember 9, 2011.  For those taxpayers who have not yet submitted their request and any documents, the following actions are necessary by September 9, 2011:

• Identifying information must be submitted to the Criminal Investigation office.  This includes name, address, date of birth, and social security number and as much of the other information requested in the Offshore Voluntary Disclosures Letter as possible.  This information must be sent to:

Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Coordinator
600 Arch Street, Room 6404
Philadelphia, PA 19106.

• Send a request for a 90-day extension for submitting the complete  voluntary disclosure package of information to the Austin campus.  This request must be sent to:

Internal Revenue Service
3651 S. I H 35 Stop 4301 AUSC
Austin, TX 78741
ATTN:  2011 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative

WHEN ARE FOREIGN PENSION PLAN CONTRIBUTIONS TAXABLE ON US TAX RETURNS?

US expatriates working for foreign employers may participate in foreign pension plans. These plans normally have beneficial tax treatment under local law. Unfortunately, these foreign arrangements generally do not meet the US "qualification rules". As a result, the beneficial treatment under local law is often not available to US citizens working abroad..

US QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

US employer sponsored pension plans qualify for special tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code: tax deductible contributions for the employer; earnings in the plan are tax exempt; and the employee is not taxed until the benefits are received upon retirement or withdrawal of those pension funds. These tax benefits are not available unless the plan meets the specific requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The determination of when amounts deferred under a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement are includible in the gross income of the taxpayer depends on the facts and circumstances of the arrangement and which Code section applies to those facts.

IRC § 402(b) Plans

Employer sponsored non-qualified funded deferred compensation plans are generally governed by the provisions of IRC § 402(b). US employees who participate in such a plan are taxed on the amount of the contributions made by the employer (once the benefits are vested or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture). If the employee is a "highly compensated" (compensation exceeds $105,000 or part of the top 20% of employees) the employee is taxed on both the contribution and the growth in the plan each year (to the extent the benefits are vested. (Non-Highly compensated employees are not taxed on the growth in the plan, but are taxed when the benefits are distributed.)

IRC § 409A

The provisions of IRC § 409A apply to deferred compensation plans not covered by IRC § 402(b), plans covered by a tax treaty or foreign pension plans that are available on a broad base to the employer's employees (but only to the extent of non-elective deferrals and employer contributions as limited by US rules).

Under IRC § 409A, if the deferred compensation arrangement does not meet the requirements of IRC § 409A, the employee will be subject to normal income tax, a 20% penalty tax and an interest charge. To meet the rules of IRC § 409A, the plan must provide that distributions from the deferred compensation plan are only allowed on separation from service, death, a specified time (or under a fixed schedule), change in control of a corporation, occurrence of an unforeseeable emergency, or if the participant becomes disabled.

The plan may not allow for the acceleration of benefits, except as provided by regulations. The plan must provide that compensation for services performed during a tax year may be deferred at the participant's election only if the election to defer is made no later than the close of the preceding tax year, or at such other time as provided in regulations.

The actual time and manner of distributions must be specified at the time of initial deferral.

INCOME TAX TREATY-PENSIONS

The normal US income tax rules may be altered by applicable treaty provisions; for example, the United States and the United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty. While the treaty does not specifically provide that each country's qualified plans will be treated as qualified plans by the other country, the treaty effectively provides for such a result with tax deferrals and tax reductions, but subject to certain limits.

In the context of a US citizen employed in the UK and participating in a pension plan established by the UK employer, the rules are that the employee may deduct (or exclude) contributions made by or on behalf of the individual to the plan; and benefits accrued under the plan are not taxable income. The Treaty further provides that the deduction (or exclusion) rule only applies to the extent the contributions or benefits qualify for tax relief in the UK and that such relief may not exceed the reliefs that would be allowed in the US under its domestic rules.

With respect to distributions the general rule under the Treaty is that a pension received by a resident of one country is only taxable by the country of residence. For Lump Sum payments, the general rule is that only the country of the situs of the pension plan may tax the distribution. However, as in most US treaties, the US retains the right to tax its citizens as if the treaty were not in force; with the result that the US retains its right to tax its citizens on both periodic distributions as well as lump sum distributions. Double taxation is avoided through the use of the foreign tax credit rules.

HOW TO TREAT CONTRIBUTIONS  TO YOUR FOREIGN PENSION PLAN

Where a US citizen employee participates in a foreign pension plan, it is likely that the plan will not have met the US qualification rules. Thus, the employee will be subject to US tax on the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan. For employees that live in a jurisdiction that imposes an income tax at rates higher than the US rate, it is likely that the employee will have generated a pool of "excess foreign tax credits". These credits may be used to offset the US tax on foreign sourced income and therefore may be used to reduce (or eliminate) the US tax that may currently arise on the deferred compensation.

If the employee has "excess foreign tax credits", (and provided the deferred compensation is "foreign sourced income"), the current US tax on such income may be partially or fully offset.  Another possibility is for the US taxpayer to make a claim under an applicable treaty (if the country of employment has a Tax Treaty with the US).. If there is a treaty with proper pension provisions, and  the contributions to the plan have not exceeded the US plan limitations, the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan should not be subject to current US income tax.  If there is no treaty with the country the expat is living in, then there is no deferral of pension contributions by a foreign employer.

An expat taxpayer has the choice of using excess foreign tax credits or invoking an applicable tax treaty to avoid having to pay current US income tax on contributions and the growth in the foreign deferred compensation scheme. Whether to use excess credits or to invoke the treaty will depend on a number of factors such as which may vary each particular situation.

TAX REPORTING:

There are a number of reporting requirements that may apply in addition to the individual's income tax return. This may include certain foreign trust  reporting returns (form 3520 and 3520A), as well as the Treasury report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts which is form TD F 90-22.1. This report must be filed when your foreign accounts(when combined together at their highest balances during the year) exceed $10,000 and covers not only bank accounts but arrangements outside the US that are virtually any type of financial account. This form must be filed by June 30 of each year, and there are no extensions. Substantial penalties (including criminal penalties) may apply.

US expatriates working for foreign employers may participate in foreign pension plans. These plans normally have beneficial tax treatment under local law. Unfortunately, these foreign arrangements generally do not meet the US "qualification rules". As a result, the beneficial treatment under local law is often not available to US citizens working abroad..

US QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

US employer sponsored pension plans qualify for special tax treatment under the Internal Revenue Code: tax deductible contributions for the employer; earnings in the plan are tax exempt; and the employee is not taxed until the benefits are received upon retirement or withdrawal of those pension funds. These tax benefits are not available unless the plan meets the specific requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The determination of when amounts deferred under a non-qualified deferred compensation arrangement are includible in the gross income of the taxpayer depends on the facts and circumstances of the arrangement and which Code section applies to those facts.

IRC § 402(b) Plans

Employer sponsored non-qualified funded deferred compensation plans are generally governed by the provisions of IRC § 402(b). US employees who participate in such a plan are taxed on the amount of the contributions made by the employer (once the benefits are vested or not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture). If the employee is a "highly compensated" (compensation exceeds $105,000 or part of the top 20% of employees) the employee is taxed on both the contribution and the growth in the plan each year (to the extent the benefits are vested. (Non-Highly compensated employees are not taxed on the growth in the plan, but are taxed when the benefits are distributed.)

IRC § 409A

The provisions of IRC § 409A apply to deferred compensation plans not covered by IRC § 402(b), plans covered by a tax treaty or foreign pension plans that are available on a broad base to the employer's employees (but only to the extent of non-elective deferrals and employer contributions as limited by US rules).

Under IRC § 409A, if the deferred compensation arrangement does not meet the requirements of IRC § 409A, the employee will be subject to normal income tax, a 20% penalty tax and an interest charge. To meet the rules of IRC § 409A, the plan must provide that distributions from the deferred compensation plan are only allowed on separation from service, death, a specified time (or under a fixed schedule), change in control of a corporation, occurrence of an unforeseeable emergency, or if the participant becomes disabled.

The plan may not allow for the acceleration of benefits, except as provided by regulations. The plan must provide that compensation for services performed during a tax year may be deferred at the participant's election only if the election to defer is made no later than the close of the preceding tax year, or at such other time as provided in regulations.

The actual time and manner of distributions must be specified at the time of initial deferral.

INCOME TAX TREATY-PENSIONS

The normal US income tax rules may be altered by applicable treaty provisions; for example, the United States and the United Kingdom Income Tax Treaty. While the treaty does not specifically provide that each country's qualified plans will be treated as qualified plans by the other country, the treaty effectively provides for such a result with tax deferrals and tax reductions, but subject to certain limits.

In the context of a US citizen employed in the UK and participating in a pension plan established by the UK employer, the rules are that the employee may deduct (or exclude) contributions made by or on behalf of the individual to the plan; and benefits accrued under the plan are not taxable income. The Treaty further provides that the deduction (or exclusion) rule only applies to the extent the contributions or benefits qualify for tax relief in the UK and that such relief may not exceed the reliefs that would be allowed in the US under its domestic rules.

With respect to distributions the general rule under the Treaty is that a pension received by a resident of one country is only taxable by the country of residence. For Lump Sum payments, the general rule is that only the country of the situs of the pension plan may tax the distribution. However, as in most US treaties, the US retains the right to tax its citizens as if the treaty were not in force; with the result that the US retains its right to tax its citizens on both periodic distributions as well as lump sum distributions. Double taxation is avoided through the use of the foreign tax credit rules.

HOW TO TREAT CONTRIBUTIONS  TO YOUR FOREIGN PENSION PLAN

Where a US citizen employee participates in a foreign pension plan, it is likely that the plan will not have met the US qualification rules. Thus, the employee will be subject to US tax on the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan. For employees that live in a jurisdiction that imposes an income tax at rates higher than the US rate, it is likely that the employee will have generated a pool of "excess foreign tax credits". These credits may be used to offset the US tax on foreign sourced income and therefore may be used to reduce (or eliminate) the US tax that may currently arise on the deferred compensation.

If the employee has "excess foreign tax credits", (and provided the deferred compensation is "foreign sourced income"), the current US tax on such income may be partially or fully offset.  Another possibility is for the US taxpayer to make a claim under an applicable treaty (if the country of employment has a Tax Treaty with the US).. If there is a treaty with proper pension provisions, and  the contributions to the plan have not exceeded the US plan limitations, the contributions to the plan and the growth in the plan should not be subject to current US income tax.  If there is no treaty with the country the expat is living in, then there is no deferral of pension contributions by a foreign employer.

An expat taxpayer has the choice of using excess foreign tax credits or invoking an applicable tax treaty to avoid having to pay current US income tax on contributions and the growth in the foreign deferred compensation scheme. Whether to use excess credits or to invoke the treaty will depend on a number of factors such as which may vary each particular situation.

TAX REPORTING:

There are a number of reporting requirements that may apply in addition to the individual's income tax return. This may include certain foreign trust  reporting returns (form 3520 and 3520A), as well as the Treasury report on Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts which is form TD F 90-22.1. This report must be filed when your foreign accounts(when combined together at their highest balances during the year) exceed $10,000 and covers not only bank accounts but arrangements outside the US that are virtually any type of financial account. This form must be filed by June 30 of each year, and there are no extensions. Substantial penalties (including criminal penalties) may apply.

Will Canada Revenue Agency Help the IRS Collect the Penalties for Various Unfiled Foreign Reporting Forms?

Click here to visit the link to recent article in the Vancouver Sun about Canada Revenue Agency Opinion. on enforcing IRS penalties for not filing FBARS, Foreign corporation and partnership forms, etc. It appears they will not help the IRS collect such penalties if assessed.

Ninth Circuit finds Fifth Amendment (self incrimination) inapplicable to offshore banking records

M.H. v. United States; No. 11-55712 (8/19/2011)

The Ninth Circuit recently held that the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination may not be used by a taxpayer under grand jury investigation for the use of his undisclosed Swiss bank accounts.

Facts. An unamed taxpayer was the target of a grand jury investigation to determine whether he used undisclosed Swiss bank accounts to evade paying federal taxes. Records indicating that the taxpayer had transferred assets from an account at UBS AG to an account with UEB Geneva in 2002 was disclosed to the U.S. under a 2009 deferred prosecution agreement between the U.S. Department of Justice and UBS.

District Court. The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California granted a motion to compel the taxpayer to provide his records pertaining to his foreign bank accounts under the Required Records Doctrine. Under the doctrine, records that are required to be maintained by law fall outside the scope of the Fifth Amendment privilege, when certain conditions are satisfied.

The taxpayer argued that the information requested could conflict with other information he may have provided to the IRS. Thus, production of the requested records would be self incriminating. Moreover, the taxpayer argued that the denial of maintaining such evidence would also be self incriminating because the failure to maintain such documentation is a felony.

Circuit Court. The Ninth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision, finding that under Grosso v. U.S., 390 U.S. 62 (1968) documents that are regulatory, customarily kept and have some public aspects apply to documents that must maintained under the Bank Secrecy Act.

The decision can be viewed at http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/08/19/11-55712.pdf.

Delinquent U.S. Foreign Information Returns: Is Filing Under the 2011 OVDI Appropriate?

Read more about whether or not you should enter the OVD program in the following article form the AICPA Tax Advisor  publication.  Click here to read the article: .